Skip to main content

OWASP LLM Top 10

The OWASP (Open Worldwide Application Security Project) LLM Top 10 represents a critical security framework specifically designed to address the unique vulnerabilities and risks associated with deploying Large Language Models in production environments. VirtueRed comprehensively tests AI systems across 10 critical security domains that encompass both the unique attack vectors introduced by language models and the adaptation of traditional security concerns to the LLM context.

Overview

As organizations rapidly integrate generative AI and large language models into their applications and workflows, they face novel security challenges that traditional application security practices fail to adequately address. LLMs introduce fundamentally new security paradigms through their natural language interfaces, vast training datasets, and integration with external tools and data sources.

Security CategoryDescription
Prompt Injection & Manipulation DefenseProtection against malicious prompt attacks
Code Execution & Injection SecurityPrevention of arbitrary code execution
Training Data Integrity & Poisoning PreventionSafeguarding training pipeline integrity
Data Privacy & ConfidentialityProtection of sensitive information
Supply-Chain & Model IntegritySecurity of model components and dependencies
Content Reliability & Misinformation ControlPrevention of hallucination and false information
System Prompt SecurityProtection of system-level instructions
Embedding & RAG SecuritySecurity of retrieval-augmented systems
Extension & Agent Permission ManagementControl of agent capabilities and tools
Resource Abuse & Model TheftPrevention of DoS and IP theft

Prompt Injection & Manipulation Defense

This category focuses on the most critical vulnerability in LLM applications - prompt injection attacks that manipulate model behavior through crafted inputs.

Attack VectorDescription
Direct Prompt InjectionTesting ability to override system instructions
Indirect Prompt InjectionEvaluating attacks through documents, emails, or web content
Instruction HierarchyAssessing maintenance of instruction priority and boundaries
Jailbreaking ResistanceTesting defenses against safety bypass techniques
Prompt LeakageEvaluating protection of system prompts and instructions

Testing Approach:

  • DarkCite authority-based manipulation
  • Bijection Learning encoded attacks
  • Crescendo multi-turn escalation
  • Flip Attack text obfuscation
  • Language Game encoding variations
  • BoN Attack augmentation techniques

Code Execution & Injection Security

This category evaluates vulnerabilities that allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or inject malicious commands through LLM interfaces.

Attack VectorDescription
Command InjectionTesting if natural language inputs can trigger system command execution
Code Generation ExploitsAssessing whether the LLM can be manipulated to generate malicious code
Sandbox EscapesEvaluating containment mechanisms when LLMs execute or evaluate code
Template InjectionTesting for server-side template injection through LLM outputs
SQL/NoSQL InjectionAssessing if LLM-generated queries can be exploited

Testing Approach:

  • Output sanitization effectiveness
  • Injection payload generation
  • Code execution boundaries
  • Downstream system protection

Training Data Integrity & Poisoning Prevention

This category addresses threats to the training process and data pipeline integrity that can compromise model behavior.

Attack VectorDescription
Data Poisoning DetectionTesting ability to identify malicious training examples
Backdoor PreventionAssessing detection of trigger-based vulnerabilities
Data Source ValidationEvaluating verification of training data provenance
Fine-tuning AttacksTesting resistance to targeted model manipulation
Reinforcement Learning ExploitationAssessing security of human feedback processes

Testing Approach:

  • Consistency across similar prompts
  • Bias detection across demographics
  • Trigger phrase identification
  • Output anomaly detection

Data Privacy & Confidentiality

This category focuses on protecting sensitive information within LLM systems from unauthorized disclosure.

Risk TypeDescription
Training Data LeakageTesting ability to extract memorized sensitive information
PII ExposureAssessing unintended disclosure of personal information
Context RetentionEvaluating cross-conversation information leakage
Differential PrivacyTesting effectiveness of privacy-preserving mechanisms
Data AnonymizationAssessing protection of individual identities in outputs

Testing Approach:

  • Training data extraction attempts
  • Membership inference attacks
  • Model inversion techniques
  • Context window exploitation
  • Cross-session information leakage

Supply-Chain & Model Integrity

This category examines risks throughout the LLM development and deployment pipeline.

Risk AreaDescription
Pre-trained Model RisksTesting for backdoors in foundation models
Fine-tuning VulnerabilitiesAssessing integrity of training data and processes
Third-party ComponentsEvaluating security of plugins, libraries, and dependencies
Model ProvenanceTesting verification of model sources and modifications
Update MechanismsAssessing security of model versioning and deployment

Testing Approach:

  • Model provenance verification
  • Behavioral consistency testing
  • Plugin security evaluation
  • Data source integrity checks

Content Reliability & Misinformation Control

This category addresses the security implications of LLM hallucinations and unreliable outputs.

Risk TypeDescription
Hallucination DetectionTesting mechanisms to identify fabricated information
Factual GroundingAssessing techniques to ensure outputs are based on reliable sources
Citation VerificationEvaluating accuracy of source attributions and references
Confidence CalibrationTesting reliability of certainty indicators in responses
Misinformation PropagationAssessing potential for spreading false information

Testing Approach:

  • Factual accuracy verification
  • Source attribution testing
  • Confidence calibration
  • Temporal consistency checks

System Prompt Security

This category focuses on protecting system-level instructions and maintaining intended LLM behavior.

Risk TypeDescription
System Prompt ExtractionTesting techniques to reveal hidden instructions
Instruction OverrideAssessing ability to supersede system-level guidance
Role ManipulationEvaluating maintenance of security boundaries between roles
Persistent Context AttacksTesting for instruction retention across sessions
Prompt Template SecurityAssessing protection of prompt engineering patterns

Testing Approach:

  • Direct extraction attempts
  • Indirect inference techniques
  • Conversation manipulation
  • Context window exploitation

Embedding & RAG Security

This category examines security vulnerabilities specific to Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems.

Attack VectorDescription
Knowledge Base PoisoningTesting injection of malicious content into retrieval systems
Embedding ManipulationEvaluating attacks on vector similarity and retrieval
Context InjectionAssessing vulnerabilities in document chunking and retrieval
Source AuthenticationTesting verification of retrieved document authenticity
Retrieval BypassEvaluating ability to ignore or override retrieved context

Testing Approach:

  • RAG injection attempts
  • Retrieval bias testing
  • Context integrity verification
  • Embedding manipulation detection

Extension & Agent Permission Management

This category evaluates security controls for LLM agents with tool use and plugin capabilities.

Risk AreaDescription
Excessive AgencyTesting if LLMs can perform unauthorized actions through tools
Permission BoundariesEvaluating enforcement of least privilege principles
Tool AuthenticationAssessing verification of plugin and API credentials
Action ValidationTesting pre-execution checks for potentially harmful operations
Delegation ChainsEvaluating security in multi-agent or recursive tool use

Testing Approach:

  • Permission boundary enforcement
  • Action authorization validation
  • Escalation attempt detection
  • Scope limitation effectiveness

Resource Abuse & Model Theft

This category addresses threats related to denial of service and intellectual property theft.

Risk TypeDescription
Model Denial of ServiceTesting vulnerability to resource exhaustion attacks
Query FloodingAssessing rate limiting and resource allocation controls
Model ExtractionEvaluating resistance to functional replication attempts
Intellectual Property TheftTesting protection of model weights and architecture
Compute Resource AbuseAssessing prevention of unauthorized resource consumption

Testing Approach:

  • Resource consumption patterns
  • Rate limiting effectiveness
  • Model extraction resistance
  • Denial-of-service resilience

See Also